Comments on: Cisco VPN Client ‘Error 51′ http://agilo.us/2009/04/23/cisco-vpn-client-error-51/ Trying to remain agile in a BIG design world. Wed, 15 Jul 2009 22:02:00 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Ed Sumerfield http://agilo.us/2009/04/23/cisco-vpn-client-error-51/comment-page-1/#comment-59 Ed Sumerfield Wed, 27 May 2009 21:32:28 +0000 http://agilo.us/?p=36#comment-59 You rock man. Just what I needed. You rock man. Just what I needed.

]]> By: Ed Sumerfield http://agilo.us/2009/04/23/cisco-vpn-client-error-51/comment-page-1/#comment-53 Ed Sumerfield Wed, 27 May 2009 14:32:28 +0000 http://agilo.us/?p=36#comment-53 You rock man. Just what I needed. You rock man. Just what I needed.

]]> By: Ed Sumerfield http://agilo.us/2009/04/23/cisco-vpn-client-error-51/comment-page-1/#comment-50 Ed Sumerfield Mon, 11 May 2009 09:47:57 +0000 http://agilo.us/?p=36#comment-50 Just read about <a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/139038/2009/02/shimo2.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.macworld.com/article/139038/2009/02/...</a> in macworld. Not sure if its a better solution. Just read about http://www.macworld.com/article/139038/2009/02/... in macworld. Not sure if its a better solution.

]]> By: Stevny http://agilo.us/2009/04/23/cisco-vpn-client-error-51/comment-page-1/#comment-49 Stevny Tue, 05 May 2009 16:30:23 +0000 http://agilo.us/?p=36#comment-49 Thanks. It worked fine on Macbook Air. Thanks. It worked fine on Macbook Air.

]]> By: gerard http://agilo.us/2009/04/23/cisco-vpn-client-error-51/comment-page-1/#comment-48 gerard Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:55:20 +0000 http://agilo.us/?p=36#comment-48 I actually blame Cisco on this one. 1) Their VPN client is propietary. 2) Their VPN client is officially only available to Cisco customers. Meaning, if your vendor is the customer, and you are the end-user, tough luck. 3) It took them about 6 months to release a version that worked on Vista. FAIL. <br><br>Had to go thru this nonsense when trying to log into our Cisco firewall from Vista. Googling revealed a lot of people asking the same question: why does Cisco suck? And then below that, a broken link to some hacker site offering the client for download. I actually blame Cisco on this one. 1) Their VPN client is propietary. 2) Their VPN client is officially only available to Cisco customers. Meaning, if your vendor is the customer, and you are the end-user, tough luck. 3) It took them about 6 months to release a version that worked on Vista. FAIL.

Had to go thru this nonsense when trying to log into our Cisco firewall from Vista. Googling revealed a lot of people asking the same question: why does Cisco suck? And then below that, a broken link to some hacker site offering the client for download.

]]>